Why Impedance Control Determines 5G Module Performance
As 5G modules move into Sub-6GHz and mmWave (26GHz+) bands, their signal transmission speed easily exceeds 10Gbps. At such high frequencies, HDI PCB impedance control becomes the decisive factor affecting signal integrity.
Industry data shows:
When impedance deviation exceeds ±10%, the Bit Error Rate (BER) of 5G signals can increase by 50%.
One well-known module manufacturer experienced impedance drifting between 58Ω–65Ω (standard: 50Ω ±5%), resulting in:
22% connection drop rate
Failure to pass carrier certification
According to IPC-2141 (High-Frequency PCB Standard), Chapter 6, the impedance deviation for 3.5GHz and 26GHz 5G bands must be ≤±5%.
PCBGOGO has focused on 5G HDI manufacturing for 7+ years, consistently achieving ±3% impedance stability for mass-produced 5G module PCBs.
This article explains the core principles, simulation workflow, and mass-production controls that guarantee 5G signal integrity.

Core Technical Analysis: Multi-Parameter Coordinated Impedance Matching
Effective impedance control for a 5G module HDI PCB requires multi-parameter coordinated matching, combining IPC-2226 HDI design rules with high-frequency signal behaviors.
2.1 Dielectric Constant (εr) Stability
The mmWave 26GHz band is extremely sensitive to εr fluctuations:
Every 0.1 change in εr increases impedance deviation by ≈3%.
Standard FR-4 (εr fluctuation ±0.3) may cause ±9% impedance deviation, failing 5G requirements.
Recommended Material:
? Rogers RO4350B — εr = 4.4 ±0.05@10GHz
? Loss tangent: 0.0037
? Ideal for 26GHz+ 5G modules
2.2 Trace Width & Spacing Precision
For 5G HDI differential routing:
Trace width: 0.12–0.15mm
Trace spacing: 0.12–0.15mm
Tolerance: ≤±0.01mm
Every 0.02mm deviation in trace width results in ≈5% impedance error, consistent with GB/T 4677 Clause 4.1.
2.3 Layer Thickness Uniformity
HDI stack-up thickness variation must be:
≤±0.005mm
A 0.01mm deviation increases impedance error by ≈2%
Based on IPC-A-600G Class 3 requirements
Common Target Impedances
| Signal Type | Target Impedance | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Single-Ended | 50Ω | RF transmission lines |
| Differential | 90Ω | PCIe 4.0, HS data lines |
Using the classical microstrip formula:
Z=60?rln?(5.98hW)Z = \frac{60}{\sqrt{\epsilon_r}} \ln\left(\frac{5.98h}{W}\right)Z=?r60ln(W5.98h)
PCBGOGO HyperLynx simulation confirms that:
Rogers RO4350B (εr=4.4)
Line width W=0.15mm
Dielectric thickness h=0.1mm
→ Achieves 50Ω ±2% impedance accuracy.
3. Implementation Guide: Four-Step HDI Impedance Control Flow
3.1 Step 1 — Material Selection
| Item | Control Target | Tools/Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Base material | RO4350B εr = 4.4 ±0.05 | Best for Sub-6GHz/mmWave |
| Alternative | Shengyi S1130 (cost-effective) | εr = 4.3 ±0.08 |
| Incoming inspection | Reject if εr deviation > ±0.05 | VNA (JPE-VNA-900) |
3.2 Step 2 — HDI Stack-Up Simulation (HyperLynx)
Example HDI stack-up: 6-layer 2+2 structure
Signal – Ground – Power – Power – Ground – Signal
Simulation requirements:
Layer thickness: 0.1mm ±0.005mm
Input measured εr (e.g., 4.42)
50Ω microstrip: W=0.15mm, h=0.1mm
90Ω diff-pair: W=0.12mm, spacing=0.12mm
Simulation pass criteria:
? Impedance deviation ≤±2%
If deviation exceeds ±3%, adjust:
h by ±0.005mm
W by ±0.005mm
PCBGOGO provides optimized stack-up within 48 hours.
3.3 Step 3 — Routing Execution
Enable “trace width lock” in Altium Designer
50Ω single-end: 0.15mm ±0.005mm
90Ω differential:
Width: 0.12mm ±0.005mm
Spacing: 0.12mm ±0.005mm
Differential pair length matching ≤3mm
Add clear impedance markers (e.g., “50Ω RF”, “90Ω PCIe”)
3.4 Step 4 — Mass-Production Control
| Stage | Control Standard | Tools |
|---|---|---|
| Lamination | 180°C ±2°C, 28kg/cm2, 90min | Laser thickness gauge |
| Thickness deviation | ≤±0.005mm | JPE-Laser-800 |
| Etching | Etching factor ≥4:1 | IPC-TM-650 2.3.17 |
| Trace width accuracy | ±0.005mm | Hourly sampling |
| Final impedance test | 50Ω: 48.5–51.5Ω, 90Ω: 87.3–92.7Ω | JPE-Imp-600 |
Yield rate: ≥99.5%
3.5 High-Frequency Interference Control (26GHz+ mmWave)
1. Shielding Design
Copper pour width ≥0.2mm on both sides of the RF trace
Keep ≥0.15mm spacing from signal line
Shielding effectiveness ≥40dB @26GHz
Tested via IPC-TM-650 2.8.1
2. Via Optimization
RF via drill: 0.2mm
Via spacing ≥0.5mm
Ground-stitch vias around signal via (0.3mm pitch)
Via impedance deviation ≤±5%
3. Absorbing Materials
mmWave absorber thickness: 0.1mm
Absorption rate ≥80% @26GHz
PCBGOGO supports automated absorber placement
Conclusion: Reliable 5G Performance Requires End-to-End Impedance Control
5G module HDI PCB impedance control depends on:
Material stability
Accurate simulation
Strict production control
For 26GHz+ mmWave scenarios, shielding and absorber design are essential.
PCBGOGO’s Full-Process 5G HDI Impedance Service includes:
? Material εr measurement report
? HyperLynx precision simulation (≤±2%)
? HDI process control (trace/layer tolerance ±0.005mm)
? 100% impedance testing (yield ≥99.5%)
Future Optimization Trends
5G HDI + LTCC integration
Impedance variation ≤±2%
Enhanced stability for mmWave
Impedance-attenuation coupled simulation
Predict total transmission performance during the design stage
5G module companies are advised to establish a High-Frequency Impedance Assurance Agreement with PCBGOGO to ensure stable certification performance.